THE HEDGING OF MAXIMS BY DAVID BECKHAM IN GOOGLE+ INTERVIEW
AbstractAyuningsih, Ika Kusti. 2014. The Hedging of Maxims by David Beckham in Google+ Interview. Study Program of English, Department of Languages and Literature, Faculty of Cultural Studies, UniversitasÂ Brawijaya.Supervisor: Iis Nur Rodliyah; Co-supervisor: Agus GozaliKeywords: Pragmatics, Cooperative Principle, Maxim, Hedging, Google+ Interview Communication is the process of exchanging information. In conversation, speakers sometimes use particular words or phrases to mitigate their statements and to indicate uncertainty in their utterances. The using of those particular words and phrases are known as hedging. In linguistics, the sub field studying contextual meaning in conversation and hedging is pragmatics. This study aims to answer two problems, which are (1) to find out the types of the hedging of maxims used by David Beckham in Google+ Interview and (2) to find out the contexts that cause the occurance of the hedging of maxims applied by David Beckham in Google+ Interview.This research is a descriptive qualitative because this research focuses ondescribing the data about what types of hedging maxim produced by DavidBeckham in Google+ interview held in January 2012. The writer also analyzes thecontexts of using hedging maxim found in David Beckhamâ€™s utterances. In thisresearch, the writer uses Hymesâ€™sÂ SPEAKING theory (1974) to analyze the data.This research reveals that David Beckham hedged maxim of quality, maxim of quantity and maxim of manner in his utterances. The writer found 37 utterances which consist of the hedging of maxims. There are 31 hedging maxim of quality, 5 hedging maxim of quantity and 1 hedging maxim of manner. The SPEAKING features theory is used by the writer to help analyze the contexts that cause the occurance of the hedging of maxims by David Beckham in Google+ Interview.The writer suggests that the next researcher analyze different objects from this research and also use different theories of the hedging of maxims from the ones used in this research.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Sorensen, C., Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. (8th ed). USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness Some Universal in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dewi, Nurri Ayudha M. (2012). A Study of Hedging Maxim Found in the Presenterâ€™s Utterances of the Ellen Degeneres Show.Thesis. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Brawijaya.
Dijk, Teun A, Van. (1992). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. England: Longman Group Ltd.
Fraser, Bruce. (2010). Hedging in political discourse: the Bush 2007 press conferences. Chapter 11.
Grice, Paul. (1995). Studies in the Way of Words. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
Google+David Beckham Interview (2012) Retrieved July 30, 2012, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VveDqucdfnc
Grundy, Peter. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. (2nd ed). London: A member of the Headline Group.
Hasanah, Uswatun. ( 2010). Hedging Maxim Performed by the Main Characters of â€œRevolutionary Roadâ€ movie. Thesis. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Brawijaya.
Missikova, Gabriela. (2007). Topics in Linguistics: Politeness and Interaction.
Maxim Hedges in Political Discourse: A Contrastive Perspective. 76-79.
Nugroho, Aylanda. (2002). The Contradiction of Certainty and Uncertainty in Hedging and Its Implications. The Contradiction of Certainty and Uncertainty in Hedging and Its Implications to Language Teaching. Journal. 1 (4). 17-22.
Rolfe, Gary. (2006). Validity, Trustworthiness and Rigour: Quality and the Idea of Qualitative Research. Journal of advanced nursing 53 (3). 304-310.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. (1998). Relevance Communication and Cognition. (2nd ed). United Kingdom: Blacwell Publisher Ltd.
Taweel, Abeer Q., Saidat, Emad M Rafayah, Hussein A., & Saidat, Ahmad M. (2011). The Linguistics Journal. Hedging in Political Discourse. 1 (5).169-196.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. (5 ed). United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aÂ Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).