Comparative Archetypal Study on Ragnarok and Christianity Apocalypse

Authors

  • Agung Wijianto Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Brawijaya

Abstract

Wijianto, Agung. 2012.  Comparative Archetypal Study on Ragnarok and Christianity Apocalypse.  Study Program of English,  Faculty of Cultural Studies University of Brawijaya. Supervisor:  Yusri Fajar;Co-supervisor: Scarletina VidyayaniKeywords:  Ragnarok, Apocalypse, archetypes, motifs.The stories about the end of the world always attract human interests. This is proven by the fact there are a lot of works that illustrate the scenarios of the End of the World. These works may be found times to times either from myths, cultures, or simply fictions. Among of all of those works, Ragnarok from Norse myth and Apocalypse from Christianity are possibly the most intriguing stories. It will be constructive to compare these two stories by using the means of archetypes. This archetypal comparison will lead to the understanding of the deep implication that both stories correspond. Archetypal approach is an approach  that studies the universal symbols called archetypes and plots called motifs contained within the story. These archetypes will serve greatly as the tool of analysis since the universality of these symbols can be applied to both works. The analysis of the archetypes will contain two categories which are the motifs and the archetypal characters.  Throughout the study, it has been found that despite the cultural and background differences of Ragnarok and Apocalypse, these two works contain universal plots and universal characters in them. It cannot be denied there are so many similarities on the terms of the archetypes. Both of the works use same motifs underlying in the plot. The same implications of the portrayal of the villain also prove to be remarkable. Ragnarok and Apocalypse, two works of different origins and cultures, contained so many similarities judging from the archetypal point of view. To a certain degree, it is recommended to further study these two works using historical approach. The comparison of how historical background affects the content of these two stories will be useful for a literary study.

References

Crews, David. (2002). On Archetypal Criticism. An essay.

Campbell, Joseph. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New Jersey: Princeton

University Press.

Dronke, Ursula (Ed.). (1997). The Poetic Edda II: Mythological Poems, Oxford:

Clarendon Press.

Frazer, James G. (1922). The Golden Bough. Abridged ed. New York: Macmillan.

Frye, Northrop. (1951). Archetypes of Literature. An essay.

Frye, Northrop. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism. New Jersey: Princeton University

Press.

Frye, Northrop. (1970). The Stubborn Structure. Ithaca, New York: Cornell

University Press.

Guerin, W. L., Labor, E., Morgan, L., Reesman, J. C., & Willingham, J. R. (1966). A

Handbook of Critical Approaches in Literature. New York: Oxford

University Press.

Grof, Stanislav. 2012 and Human Destiny: End of the World or Consciousness

Revolution?. Retrieved from http://www.greatmystery.org/nl/cancun2012grof-

html

Jung, C.G. (1927). Collected Works Vol. 8. The Structure and Dynamics of the

Psyche. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1945). Psychological Reflections: A New Anthology of His Writings. New

Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Jung, C.G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. New York:

Pantheon.

Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. London: Aldus Books.

Lamb. (2010). In Symbols. Retrieved December 22, 2012, from

http://symbols.ehibou.com/lamb/ Larkin, Clarence. (1919). The Book of Revelation A Study of the Last Prophetic Book

of Holy Scripture. Philadelphia: Self Published.

Lewis, C. S. (1958). Reflection on the Psalms: The Celebrated Musings on One of the

Most Intriguing Books of the Bible. Orlando: A Harvest Book/Harcourt, Inc.

Lindemans, Micha F.. (1999). Freyr. Encyclopedia Mythica. Retrieved December 12,

, from http://www.pantheon.org/articles/f/freyr.html

Lisboa, Maria Manuel. (2011). The End of the World: Apocalypse and its Aftermath

in Western Culture. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

Mani, A., Rash, A. Ellison, N., LePage, D. (2012). Norse Mythology. Healigan’s

Wiki 2012. Retrieved from http://healigan.wikispaces.com/

Norse+Mythology

Manser, Martin H. (2009). Critical Companion to Bible. New York: Info Base

Publishing.

Munch, Peter Andreas. (1926). Norse Mythology Legends of Gods and Heroes (S. B

Hustvedt, Trans.). New York: The American-Scandinavian Foundation.

(Original work published 1922)

North, Richard. (2010). Voluspa and Book of Revelation. An Essay. Retrieved

from http://www.scribd.com/doc/29518129/Voluspa-and-the-Book-of-

Revelation-by-Richard-North

Stallknecht, Newton P., & Frenz, Hortz (Eds.). (1961). Comparative Literature:

Method and Perspective. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Thorpe, Benjamin. (2004). The Poetic Edda Northvegr Edition. Michigan: The

Northvegr Foundation Press.

Vance, Laurence M. (1993). A Brief History of the King James Bible. A Brief History

of English Bible Translation. Pensacola: Vance Publications.

Vogler, Christopher. (1998). A Writer’s Journey. California: Michael Wiese

Production.

Williams, David M.. (2008). Eschatology and the Book of Revelation. An Essay

Downloads

Published

2014-02-03

Issue

Section

Articles