FLOUTING MAXIM OF RELEVANCE RELATED TO FACE THREATENING ACT STRATEGIES IN PESBUKERS REALITY SHOW SPECIAL EDITION â€œVALENTINEâ€
AbstractLanguage is a device used by human beings to communicate in the society. In the process of communication, people take and give messages to convey their feelings, ideas, or things in mind. The process itself can be found in a reality show, such as Pesbukers reality show. Pesbukers reality show presents a comedy. The actors and actresses do flouting maxim of relevance because theyhave various purposes such as having hidden meaning, saving face act, avoiding face threatening act and making a joke. There are two problems of the study, namely: (1) what are face threatening act strategies applied in flouting maxim of relevance in Pesbukers reality show, and (2) what are the intended meaning of flouting maxim of relevance related to face threatenIng act strategies in Pesbukers reality show.This study focuses on flouting maxim of relevance and face threatening act strategies that are applied in Pesbukers reality show. The writer used qualitative approach because the writer collected the data in the form of words. The writer uses a transcription of Pesbukers reality show. She decided the utterances that are categorized into FTA strategies, and identified the intended meaning of the utterances based on Brown and Levinsonâ€™s theory (1987).The results of this study showed there were 12 utterances containing flouting maxim of relevance produced by the hosts and the guest stars. Those utterances were conforming Brown and Levinsonâ€™s theory (1987) of FTA strategies. There were three strategies used in Pesbukers reality show that werepositive politeness, negative politeness, and off record. The mostly used strategy was positive politeness which was shown by noticing the speakersâ€™ interest, seeking an agreement to make a deal, and avoiding disagreement. The second strategy was negative politeness. The hosts and guest stars used negative politeness to minimize the imposition to others. The last strategy was off record. Mostly, they used off record by using an irony to tease each other.The writer suggests the further researcher conduct a research about FTAstrategies focusing on certain strategy for example positive politeness in any other subjects, such as movies, comics, magazines, speeches, dramas and so forth in order to have deeper analysis.Â Keywords: Flouting maxim, flouting maxim of relevance, face threatening act strategies
Akmajian,Adrian., Demers, R. A., et al.(1995). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ary,Donald., Jacobs, L. C., et al.(2002).Introduction to research in education, Sixth Edition.Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth.
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cutting, Joan. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse. New York: Routledge.
Fauzi, R. R. (2011). An analysis of face threatening act (FTA) used by the main characters in â€œSuper Nannyâ€ reality show. Unpublished Thesis. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Grice, H. P.(1975). Logics and conversation. In Cole, Peter and J. Morgan (1975). Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academy Press.
Grundy, Peter. (2000). Doingpragmatics: Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. Inc.
Khosravideh, Parvaneh&Sadehvandi, Nikan. (2011). Someinstances of violation and flouting of the maxim of quantity by the maincharacters (Barry&Tim)in Dinner for Schmucks. Unpublished paper presented at 2011 International Conference on Languages, Literature and Linguistics, Sharif
University of Technology, Singapore.
Kurniasari, Nena. (2011). Face threatening act in email sent by Prita Mulyasari about Omni International Hospital health service.Unpublished Thesis. Malang. Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pesbukers. (2013). Retrieved March 2, 2013, From http://www.an.tv/pesbukers/Pesbukers Lop U Pull Edisi Valentine. (2013). Retrieved March 2, 2013, From
Pesbukers Lop U Pull Edisi Valentine. (2013). Retrieved March 2, 2013, From http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KS_CePfi28
Pesbukers Lop U Pull Edisi Valentine. (2013). Retrieved March 2, 2013, From http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5U2RyChLPc
Pesbukers Lop U Pull Edisi Valentine. (2013). Retrieved March 2, 2013, From http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdnK3UWax3I
Reality Show.(2011). Retrieved March 2, 2013,
From http://www.ask.com/question/what-is-the-definition-of-a-reality- show
Rating Pesbukers. Retrieved March 28, 2013,
Yule, George. (1985). The study of language: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aÂ Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).